Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÃøµÎÇϾǰüÀýÀÇ °ñ°üÀý¿° Ä¡·á¿¡¼­ Avocado/Soybean UnsaponifiablesÀÇ È¿¿ë¼º

Clinical Effect of Avocado/Soybean Unsaponifiables on Osteoarthritis of the Temporomandibular Joint

´ëÇѱ¸°­³»°úÇÐȸÁö 2006³â 31±Ç 2È£ p.185 ~ 197
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±èÈñÁø/Kim HJ ¹ÚÁØ»ó/°í¸í¿¬/¾È¿ë¿ì/Park JS/Ko MY/Ahn YW

Abstract

º» ¿¬±¸´Â 2003³â 10¿ùºÎÅÍ 2006³â 3¿ù±îÁö ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³ º´¿ø ±¸°­³»°ú ±¸°­¾È¸éÅëÁõŬ¸®´Ð¿¡ ³»¿øÇÏ¿© RDC/TMD¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ÃøµÎÇϾǰüÀýÀÇ °ñ°üÀý¿°À¸·Î Áø´ÜµÈ ȯÀÚ Áß º» ½ÇÇè¿¡ µ¿ÀÇÇÑ Æó°æ±â°¡ ¿ÀÁö ¾ÊÀº ¿©¼º ȯÀÚ¸¦ ¹«ÀÛÀ§·Î ³ª´©¾î, ÁÖ±âÀû ³»¿ø ÇÏ¿¡ ½ÇÁ¦·Î ASU 300 §·À» ¿¬¼Ó º¹¿ëÇÑ ASU±º(ÃÑ 36¸í)°ú ASU¿Í µ¿ÀÏÇÑ Á¦ÀçÀÌÁö¸¸ ¾àÈ¿°¡ ¾ø´Â ¾à¹°À» º¹¿ëÇÑ À§¾à±º(ÃÑ 32¸í)À¸·Î ºÐ·ùÇÏ¿© ASU¸¦ Àå±â°£ Åõ¿©½Ã ÅëÁõ, °üÀýÀ½, °³±¸Á¦ÇÑ(LOM), ¹«Å뼺 ÆíÀÌ °³±¸·®(MCO)ÀÇ º¯È­»Ó¸¸ ¾Æ´Ï¶ó °ñ½ºÄµÀÇ ´Ü¼ø¼·ÃëÀ²(SUR), coronal SPECT»ó¿¡¼­ÀÇ ¿ÂÁ¡°³¼ö(HS), ±×¸®°í CT»ó¿¡¼­ÀÇ °úµÎ °üÀý¸éÀÇ ºñ±³½Ã ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº °á°ú¸¦ ¾ò¾ú´Ù.
1. ASU±º°ú À§¾à±ºÀÇ Ä¡·á Àü, Ä¡·á 3°³¿ù ÈÄ, Ä¡·á 6°³¿ù ÈÄ, Ä¡·á 9°³¿ù ÈÄÀÇ ¹«Å뼺 ÆíÀÌ°³±¸·®(MCO)°ú ÅëÁõ, °üÀýÀ½, °³±¸Á¦ÇÑ(LOM)ÀÇ NAS¸¦ ºñ±³½Ã µÎ ±º°£ÀÇ À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ¾ø¾ú´Ù.
2. ASU±º°ú À§¾à±ºÀÇ Ä¡·á Àü, Ä¡·á 3°³¿ù ÈÄ, Ä¡·á 6°³¿ù ÈÄ, Ä¡·á 9°³¿ù ÈÄÀÇ MCO¸¦ ºñ±³½Ã ÀåÄ¡Ä¡·á¸¦ ½ÃÇàÇÏÁö ¾ÊÀº µÎ ±º°£¿¡¼­´Â À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ¾ø¾ú´Ù. ±×·¯³ª, ÀåÄ¡Ä¡·á¸¦ ½ÃÇàÇÑ ASU±º¿¡¼­ À§¾à±º¿¡ ºñÇØ Ä¡·á 6°³¿ù ÈÄ, Ä¡·á 9°³¿ù ÈÄ¿¡ MCO°¡ ´õ Áõ°¡ÇÏ´Â °æÇâÀ» º¸¿´´Ù.
3. ASU±º°ú À§¾à±ºÀ» ÃÊÁø½Ã ÅëÁõ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ NAS°¡ 6¹Ì¸¸ÀÎ °æ¿ì¿Í 6ÀÌ»óÀÎ °æ¿ì·Î ºÐ·ùÇÏ¿© Ä¡·á Àü, Ä¡·á 3°³¿ù ÈÄ , Ä¡·á 6°³¿ù ÈÄ, Ä¡·á 9°³¿ù Èĸ¦ ºñ±³½Ã µÎ ±º ¸ðµÎ Ä¡·á 3°³¿ù ÈÄ, Ä¡·á 9°³¿ù ÀÌÈÄ¿¡ ÅëÁõÀÌ ´õ °¨¼ÒÇϸç, ÅëÁõÀÇ NAS°¡ 6ÀÌ»óÀÎ °æ¿ì¿¡¼­ ASU±ºÀÌ À§¾à±º¿¡ ºñÇØ ÅëÁõÀÌ ´õ °¨¼ÒÇÏ´Â °æÇâÀ» º¸¿© ÁÖ¾ú´Ù.
4. ÁÖ±âÀû ³»¿øÇÏ¿¡ 6°³¿ù°£ ¾à¹°Ä¡·á¸¦ ½ÃÇàÇÑ ASU±º(ÃÑ19¸í)°ú À§¾à±º(ÃÑ 21¸í)ÀÇ MCO¿Í ÅëÁõ, °üÀýÀ½, °³±¸Á¦ÇÑÀÇ NAS¸¦ ºñ±³½Ã °¢ ±º³»¿¡¼­´Â ÀÓ»óÁõ»óÀÇ °³¼±ÀÌ ÇöÀúÇÏ¿´À¸³ª, µÎ ±º°£¿¡¼­´Â À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ¾ø¾ú´Ù.
5. ASU±º°ú À§¾à±ºÀ» ÀÌȯÃø°ú ºñÀÌȯÃøÀ¸·Î ºÐ·ùÇÏ¿© ÃøµÎÇϾǰüÀýÀÇ °ñ½ºÄµÀÇ ´Ü¼ø¼·ÃëÀ²(SUR)°ú coronal SPECT»ó¿¡¼­ÀÇ ¿ÂÁ¡°³¼ö(HS)¸¦ ºñ±³½Ã µÎ ±º ¸ðµÎ¿¡¼­ ÀÌȯÃøÀÌ ºñÀÌȯÃø¿¡ ºñÇØ ´Ü¼ø¼·ÃëÀ²°ú ¿ÂÁ¡°³¼ö ¸ðµÎ ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸¸ç, ´Ü¼ø¼·ÃëÀ²°ú ¿ÂÁ¡°³¼ö´Â »ó°ü°ü°è¸¦ º¸¿©ÁÖ¾ú´Ù.
6. ÀÌȯ ¹× ºñÀÌȯ °üÀý ¸ðµÎ¿¡¼­ °ñÀçÇü¼º ¹ÝÀÀÀÌ °¡Àå ¸¹ÀÌ °üÂûµÇ¾ú°í, °ñÁõ½Äü´Â °¡Àå Àû°Ô °üÂûµÇ¾ú´Ù. Ä¡·áÀüÈÄÀÇ ASU±º(ÃÑ 34ºÎÀ§)°ú À§¾à±º(ÃÑ 20ºÎÀ§)ÀÇ °úµÎ °üÀý¸éÀ» ºñ±³½Ã ASU±º¿¡¼­ º¸´Ù ¸¹Àº ħ½Ä¼Ò°ßÀÇ °¨¼Ò°æÇâÀ» º¸¿©ÁÖ¾ú´Ù.

The aim of this study was to investigate the beneficial effect of a daily dose of 300 §· of ASU taken for more than 3 months on the subjects diagnosed as osteoarthritis of temporomandibular joint by RDC/TMD.
Total 68 outpatients(15-54y) of female except menopause in Orofacial Pain Clinics of the Pusan National University Hospital were randomly assigned to either an ASU group(n=36) or a placebo group(n=32). The pain, noise and limited mouth opening(LOM) were evaluated by numerical analogue scale(NAS, range 0-10) and maximum comfortable opening(MCO) were measured by milimeter scale. The difference of simple uptake rate(SUR) on bone scan, hot spot(HS) on coronal SPECT, condylar bony changes on CT between the ASU and placebo groups were compared to investigate the objective effect.
The obtained results were as follows.
1. Comparison of the NAS of pain, noise, LOM and MCO before treatment and 3, 6 and 9 months after treatment showed no significant difference between the ASU and placebo groups.
2. Comparison of the NAS of pain, noise, LOM and MCO before treatment and 3, 6 and 9 months after treatment showed no significant difference between the ASU and placebo groups without splint treatment, but showed more increased MCO in the ASU group than the placebo group with splint treatment at 6, 9 months after treatment.
3. Comparison of the NAS of pain before treatment and 3, 6 and 9 months after treatment that the NAS of pain at first visit divided into two groups(above or below 6) showed more decreased the NAS of pain in the ASU group than the placebo group that the NAS of pain at first visit was above 6.
4. Comparison of the NAS of pain, noise, LOM and MCO during 6 months period showed improvement of clinical symptoms within group, but no significant difference between subjects.
5. The simple uptake ratio(SUR) on bone scan and hot spot(HS) on coronal SPECT showed more increased SUR and HS in affected side than non-affected side of the ASU and placebo groups.
6. Comparing of condylar bony changes, osseous remodeling were observed highest, osteophyte lowest in the affected and non-affected side of the two groups. After treatment, comparison of condylar bony changes were observed more decreased erosive features in the ASU group than the placebo group.

Å°¿öµå

RDC/TMD;°ñ°üÀý¿°;ASU;Osteoarthritis

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI